We discussed this on our show of February 14, 2021. The House managers, as Members of the House of Representatives, have immunity to lie while they are in the Well of the House. Many Representatives on both sides of the aisle do it often. This is meant as a protection, allowing Representatives to discuss and debate any topic. However when the House Managers crossed over to the Senate they lost this immunity and should now face jail time for lying as court officers.
“In a Congress run by those who are genuinely interested in protecting the Constitution, these individuals would be thrown out of Congress, for lying and tossed into jail. That’s not this Congress. It’s not run by genuine Constitutionalists. It’s run by people who use the Constitution as a rag to wash their bum with. Witness a Fake Impeachment.”Article
They lied as officers of the Court of Impeachment. There’s no protection in any court that says that a prosecutor is allowed to lie. There’s no protection that says any court official can lie to the court. They took an oath of office, that states clearly that they are supposed to uphold the laws of the Constitution. Their immunity does not extend to everything they do. Can they lie that they didn’t accept a bribe? No. As an extension, it follows that they were expected to follow the laws of court during the trial phase of the impeachment process. They didn’t. They lied!
When working as House Managers within the Senate, they lose that immunity. Here’s why. The Impeachment process makes the vote in the House to be the one sided view of the prosecution. We know this part as the grand jury in regular court proceedings. The trial process is in the Senate. As they are working in the Senate they are acting as Prosecutors, court officers. They’re no longer protected by immunity for lying. As in a regular court if they are presenting fake or doctored evidence they are presenting false information. This isn’t politics. This is a legal proceeding. There’s a person put in the position of judge and there is a jury. Remember, the purpose of an Impeachment Hearing is to levy a consequence. It’s not a discussion or debate. It’s a judgement.
Notice Below how the New York Times identifies the House Managers as PROSECUTORS! Can’t get more definitive from the LEFT on this. These Particular Leftists are their Standard of belief! What the NYT says, they do. Remember when they spoke favorably of Hitler and the Nazi’s.
Therefore, if the Impeachment Managers do not have immunity, then they should be facing the same type of backlash that a prosecutor or officer of the court would face if they put forward false information as true, as if they had lied to the court. Which they did.
We know they didn’t do a thorough process of vetting their evidence to ensure its validity. Sloppiness is not an excuse. This is especially true of lawyers and those who have the entire weight of resources of the House of Representatives at their disposal. They did not contact the originators of the Tweets they used in the trial. They altered visual documentation of tweets. As is the case of Jennifer Lynn Lawrence. According to House Manager Swalwell (Source). Looking at the video you will note that Jennifer Lynn Lawrence is a verified account (the blue checkmark). In reality, she’s not (Source). This is a false representation to the Court.
There’s more, the reference to Cavalry and Calvary. The Impeachment Managers NEVER interviewed Kylie Jane Kremer’s tweets (Source). What’s odd, we hear often how the Right is a bunch of Right Wing Christians. Yet when someone uses Christian Terminology, the Left tries to claim that there’s no way President Trump would be able to note the difference. So, we’re Right-Wing Christians when it’s convenient for their narrative. Regardless, this isn’t the 1890’s. There’s no more cavalry riding to the rescue. It’s a turn of phrase, like – “You can take it to the bank.” or as “That’s the last straw.” or “How do you know a politician is lying? They’re talking!” – Oh, sorry. That last one is true.
As evidence that they knowingly did falsify evidence and were capable of doing their due diligence. The Prosecutors in the case were able to do their due diligence in regards to the tweet of the changed date of January 3, 2020 to January 3, 2021 tweet. They “caught” the mistake (doctoring of evidence) but misrepresented the facts in the other tweet. Here’s the quote from Business Insider:
In addition to the House Prosecutors lies and doctoring of evidence. The House Prosecutors didn’t do basic due diligence of research. This wasn’t conducted by the House Managers on their evidence. That’s three failures to follow proper and legal court procedures. All three of which are actionable behaviors. The Impeachment Managers attempted to shotgun their case through, hoping to gain some traction for their unconstitutional behavior.
Well, what should be the consequences?
In a Congress run by those who are genuinely interested in protecting the Constitution, these individuals would be thrown out of Congress, for lying and tossed into jail. That’s not this Congress. It’s not run by genuine Constitutionalists. It’s run by people who use the Constitution as a rag to wash their bum with. Witness a Fake Impeachment.
Remember Roger Stone. He got years for “lying” to Congress. An old man who forgot his information and didn’t lie. Stone gets years (Source). Impeachment Managers get nothing. This is unequal justice. This is the “big club” that we’re not in but the House Managers who lied and manipulated evidence are in. If you lied in court, you get jail. If they lie in court. They get accolades from the Corporate Media!
To be clear, they misrepresented President Trump’s actions and behaviors. We’re not addressing that selective editing of videos or the purposely attempting to make President Trump look bad through the cherry picking of tweets. We’re talking about the deliberate falsifying of information. We’re also not arguing that the Prosecution withheld evidence from the defense team. This again is also a violation of procedure by the House Managers.
What do you think the consequence should be?